Name:
Location: bangalore, karnataka, India

Sometimes editor, sometimes counsellor. Trying to find a way of life that makes some sense to me.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

basis for ethical judgement

I was reading an article the other day from NYT that mentioned a major paradigm shift as to the source of unethical action. While the rest of the article talked about how faith supersedes all else today, there was a point in the intro that stuck with me. It talked of how we have gone from a state where godlessness sanctioned every possible excess and violence because of a lack of ethical judgement to a point where godliness sanctions every form of violence in the name of a divine cause (read Bush and Islamic suicide bombers and Godhra rioters in same sentence).
It got me thinking about the reverse. Religion has always talked about acts of altruism having the final goal of a better afterlife. Do good to your fellow man and you will attain the heavens (I am not saying that is the exact message, but that is what most of us have come to understand) However, in a world of scientific advancement that has created an almost null belief in the afterlife and in domains such as heaven and hell, an atheist or even an agnost has little reason to do good for an afterlife that might never come when doing bad/ not doing good will give more tangible rewards.
On the other hand, for an agnost with a semblance of a social conscience as me, the impelling force in the matter is the hope of creating a better world for all of us to live in. However, we have now come to inhabit a world driven by consumption, where selfishness is hailed as a virtue, and not doing good is rewarded by saving the non-doer energy and resources that are otherwise considered wasted on a lost cause.
The quandary for me is where to find the inclination to do good. If both spirituality and universal understandings of right and wrong have failed, where is the path to tread? I know I must do right, but how do I know what is the right and the wrong? How do I guide myself and others who think like me towards those choices?

P.s. On a more personal note, why do I find abstinence (of all forms of indulgence, not necessarily sexual) so hard when I know that is what is best for me?

13 Comments:

Blogger Jason Kerr said...

You pose many difficult questions that cannot be adequetly discussed in a comment, but I will try my best. I would suggest that religious (I assume that is what you mean by spiritual) understandings of right and wrong have not failed, rather, they have been hijacked by men in their quest for power. I also think that in order to know right from wrong you need to establish who is the highest moral power in the universe. Athiests believe the highest moral powers are human, therefore humans decide what is right and wrong. Muslims, Christians, and Jews believe in a power greater than human beings, and that power decides what is right and wrong for them. Of course, deciding what is right and what is wrong does not imply that the higher power endorses the actions of all religious people.

12:39 PM  
Blogger T said...

hellooooooooo! i didn't read ur post, but am sure its terribly interesting...hee hee..
I got intrigued by the way u've described urself...hilarious! thought shd say so. how u doin man? keep in touch!

Tarang

2:00 AM  
Blogger T said...

and child... tell me are u capable of getting some corruption exposing, true articles into any newspaper..??

2:02 AM  
Blogger RTP said...

i work in features da. so not really doing serious journalism. but if you can mail me and tell me what it's about, maybe i can put you onto someone who can do something

10:13 AM  
Blogger Avalonian said...

"i work in features da. so not really doing serious journalism. "- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

9:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey... nice post... too many questions to answer... and higher thinking processes involved... will refresh my brain page and give opinion...
in the mean time check out my blog for nonsense... no questions asked
www.spazsayz.blogspot.com..
see ya some time
adios

11:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

society and social upbringing could be culprits or rather creators of these jargons of right and wrong... quite like blind faith.
i agree with man on fire(???) get your moral power... and then (hopefully) answers will follow.

9:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its a human sign to find oneself in a state of "trishanku" when it comes to the issue of ethical judgement.All one needs to do is to realise that all the answers lie within the self and stop blaming everything around.Spare a moment with thy self and you will have all your questions answered.

7:49 AM  
Blogger DuhGodess said...

**And the peasants danced for joy**

Mehr man, who's avolonian? sounds very christ college like... uses words like "helen, jolly and pondy" on his page of push-button publishing... just curious...

11:23 AM  
Blogger Chandy said...

ah mehar wonderful. questions like that give me hope that there are people who care. not just going about in a 'whatEver' mode. good good.

12:56 PM  
Blogger Chandy said...

and avalonian is the erstwhile guitarist of soup of the day and some other band

1:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"And what is good, Phaedrus,
And what is not good-
Need we ask anyone to tell us these
things?"

8:33 PM  
Blogger nkshirsa said...

hi dude,

enjoy reading your blog. i've just landed up in blore, relocated here about a week back. looking for social contacts (read friends), fellow drinkers (and what else have you), musicians/singers ..

take care,
nikhil.

3:27 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home